EditorPricingBlog

Stallone pitched an AI de aged ‘Rambo’ prequel | what it means for AI filmmakers

September 28, 2025
Stallone pitched an AI de aged ‘Rambo’ prequel | what it means for AI filmmakers

Share this post:

Stallone pitched an AI de aged Rambo prequel | what happened

Sylvester Stallone told the press that he pitched a Rambo prequel in which he would play an eighteen year old John Rambo using modern de aging and AI techniques. The idea is straightforward. Take the original actor, capture a fresh performance, then map that performance to a younger face and voice that align with the character’s backstory. The trades report that he considers the tech sophisticated enough for the attempt, while separate coverage on the new prequel notes the project is moving ahead without Stallone in the lead and that the director has questioned whether current methods are ready to carry a full feature. Read together, these items sit in the tension that many teams feel right now. The creative ambition is real, but the practical burden of making a youthful performance feel natural across close ups, stunts, and dialogue is still significant. That is the frame for the production choices below.

Why this matters for production

Treat de aging as a production strategy, not a filter. If you are considering a de aged lead, plan for a hybrid approach that mixes face work, body doubles, stunt doubles, and careful sound. Even with strong face replacement and relighting, you will lean on editorial to maintain eye trace and motivation, and you will need extra coverage for safety. For budgets and schedules, think like a film with a full VFX character. You will need scans, training, tracking and retargeting passes, quality control, and likely a second wave of dialogue or voice cloning. Most teams are better served by placing de aging where it shines, such as flashbacks or contained sequences that can be supervised closely. For long dialogue runs in bright light, the uncanny risk climbs fast. None of this kills the idea. It simply pushes you to place the tool where it supports the story rather than asking it to carry the entire performance.

Rights, consent, and ethics

The moment you use an actor’s younger likeness you step into a different legal and ethical lane. Lock explicit consent in writing for face and for voice, and separate the two so there is no ambiguity about archival audio or synthetic speech. Spell out scope of use, term, geography, and downstream uses like trailers, games, and promotional tie ins. If you plan to train or fine tune any system on the actor’s past work, you need permission for that as a distinct activity, not as an implied step. Keep a paper trail with prompts, seeds, model versions, and vendor logs so you can answer questions later and so you can reproduce a shot if a note comes in near delivery. If estates are involved, route all of the above through the correct representatives and keep distribution limits crystal clear. The simplest test is the audience test. If they would feel deceived by how you present the performance, change the plan.

Practical takeaways for filmmakers

Start with tests that look like your movie. Shoot a scene in your lighting plan and run a vendor bakeoff before you lock the look. Use de aging for contained beats that matter, then cast the rest in a way that preserves continuity and reduces risk. Favor controlled lighting and measured performance where the face has room to breathe. Separate picture strategy from voice strategy. Decide early whether you will use ADR, archival material, or synthetic voice, and budget each path. Add a rights and safety checkpoint before marketing handoff so you do not find yourself clearing a trailer after the cut is public. If the tests sing and the schedule can hold, scale up with confidence. If the tests wobble, keep the tool where it serves the story and let your actors carry the rest.

Sources

Continue Reading

    © 2025 - AI FILMS LLC